The generally accepted view is that the Universe is an unchanging "block" of space-time; this idea arises directly from Einstein's equations.
So you can think of everything that ever did exist, does exist or will exist as all somehow being out there in space-time," says Dr Kristie Miller, director of the Centre for Time at the University of Sydney , Australia. One way to visualise the block model is to think of other places in time as being like other places in space: "We are here in Sydney, but there are other people located in Singapore and London.
Those places are perfectly real, it's just that we aren't at them," says Dr Miller. This is good news for the budding time traveller, because it suggests there is nothing to stop us from swapping where we are now for some other place and time. But, importantly, it also implies that the past, present and the future are already written, so that if we were to travel back in time, we wouldn't be able to alter it.
To take an oft-quoted example, we shouldn't be able to kill someone's grandparent so that their descendant will cease to exist in the future. The block model treats our everyday concept of time as an illusion, a way that humans rationalise reality. He believes that the passage of time is a real and fundamental phenomenon. His colleague Prof Neil Turok, director of the Perimeter Institute, thinks the weird world of quantum physics could be crucial to answering this question.
This area of physics emerges at very small scales, where the rules of classical physics we learnt about in our school textbooks break down. For example, in the quantum world, it might be possible for a particle to be in many places at once. Prof Turok explains that time travel remains a distant hope because "no one really has any plausible idea of how to go backwards in time right now".
But he adds: "One should never say never, because some clever person will come along and tell you how to break the rule. Ron Mallett built a device that illustrates principles he believes could be used to build a time machine.
Ron Mallett has a dream: He wants to travel in time. While Bill and Ted travel to the past to pick up Socrates with relative ease, in reality scientists and researchers need to find a way to circumvent the rules of physics in order to travel back in time.
Wormholes, black holes, cosmic strings , and circulating light beams have all been suggested as potential solutions for time-traveling to the past.
The main challenge that astrophysicists are grappling with is figuring out is how to beat a light beam to a point in spacetime and back. Since the speed of light is the absolute maximum, physicists are concentrating on finding phenomena like wormholes, which could provide tunnel-like shortcuts that jump across curved spacetime and, in theory, beat a light beam to a particular point in spacetime.
So while time traveling to the past may be the more exciting concept, scientists are much more likely to fling someone into the unknown future rather than the well-trodden past. But despite overwhelming odds—fiscal and scientific—Mallet believes the future of a time-traveling society is possible.
If the government and taxpayers wanted to pay for it, we could do it in the next twenty years. For now, wannabe time travelers will still have to look to science fiction for its time travel fix, with some movies being much more accurate than others.
Type keyword s to search. A Time Travel Crash Course. Bettmann Getty Images. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site. James Brittain Getty Images. Related Story. Just a quick light year jaunt to Keplerf. If the girl dies, she cannot become the time traveler's mother.
But if the time traveler was never born, he could not go back and murder his mother. Paradoxes of this kind arise when the time traveler tries to change the past, which is obviously impossible.
But that does not prevent someone from being a part of the past. Suppose the time traveler goes back and rescues a young girl from murder, and this girl grows up to become his mother. The causal loop is now self-consistent and no longer paradoxical. Causal consistency might impose restrictions on what a time traveler is able to do, but it does not rule out time travel per se. Even if time travel isn't strictly paradoxical, it is certainly weird.
Consider the time traveler who leaps ahead a year and reads about a new mathematical theorem in a future edition of Scientific American. He notes the details, returns to his own time and teaches the theorem to a student, who then writes it up for Scientific American. The article is, of course, the very one that the time traveler read. The question then arises: Where did the information about the theorem come from?
Not from the time traveler, because he read it, but not from the student either, who learned it from the time traveler. The information seemingly came into existence from nowhere, reasonlessly.
The bizarre consequences of time travel have led some scientists to reject the notion outright. Stephen W. Hawking of the University of Cambridge has proposed a chronology protection conjecture, which would outlaw causal loops. Because the theory of relativity is known to permit causal loops, chronology protection would require some other factor to intercede to prevent travel into the past.
What might this factor be? One suggestion is that quantum processes will come to the rescue. The existence of a time machine would allow particles to loop into their own past. Calculations hint that the ensuing disturbance would become self-reinforcing, creating a runaway surge of energy that would wreck the wormhole. Chronology protection is still just a conjecture, so time travel remains a possibility. A final resolution of the matter may have to await the successful union of quantum mechanics and gravitation, perhaps through a theory such as string theory or its extension, so-called M-theory.
It is even conceivable that the next generation of particle accelerators will be able to create subatomic wormholes that survive long enough for nearby particles to execute fleeting causal loops. This would be a far cry from Wells's vision of a time machine, but it would forever change our picture of physical reality.
He is one of the most prolific writers of popular-level books in physics. His scientific research interests include black holes, quantum field theory, the origin of the universe, the nature of consciousness and the origin of life.
Credit: Nick Higgins. Already a subscriber? Sign in. And that even if his time machine does work, he admits, it would have a severe limitation that would prevent anyone from, say, traveling back in time to kill baby Adolf Hitler. Care about supporting clean energy adoption? Find out how much money and planet! By signing up through this link , Futurism. Time Twister.
0コメント